Ten ways the COVID-19 pandemic is contributing to growing inequalities

Nationally and internationally, the COVID-19 pandemic is revealing and intensifying the inequalities between rich and poor. The virus is the same, but that is how far the equality extends.

Different access to private spaces, safe work environments, health care, economic support and vaccine are not only revealing existing inequalities around the world but also intensifying them.

Local inequalities

Nationally, there are inequalities depending on if you are able to transition your work online, working from home or if you have to continue working outside of your home, increasing the risk of infection dramatically. Many people able to work from anywhere have, while schools are closed, escaped cities for vacation houses with more open spaces.

Many have also lost their jobs altogether during this time. Although Australia has rolled out some extensive economic support packages such as the JobSeeker and JobKeeper, there are still those that found themselves without backing, such as non-citizens with casual, short-term employments. These payments have decreased substantially in the last few months, although many industries have yet to recover.

International disparities

However, the main inequalities can be found internationally. The effects are not limited to peoples’ health and access to medical treatment, the effects on people’s economic stability and food safety have been huge as lockdowns and other preventative measures have led to loss of employment and other sources of income.  

In India, for example, the country with the second most infections after the US, the pandemic has caused severe suffering. A sudden and strict lockdown in March left tens of thousands of migrant workers stuck, trying to get out of the city by foot in search for work. Millions of infections around the country meant that hospitals were (and are) strained well over capacity and had to turn patients away to their deaths. The pandemic also intensified Islamophobia as Muslims were blamed for the fast spread of the virus, unemployment and hunger.

The virus hit all economies hard and around the world lockdowns led to extreme hunger and poverty. Some countries were worse equipped to deal with these unprecedented events. Countries around Asia, South America and Africa saw a sharp increase in people living in extreme poverty and hunger. Colombian households struggling in lockdown waved red flags in their windows, a cry for help and donations from passers-by.

The latest State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World report estimates that in 2019, 690 million people suffered from severe, chronic hunger. This number has increased by approximately 60 million in the last five years. Exact numbers are impossible to obtain, but the same report predicts that the pandemic might have brought another 130 million people into chronic hunger by the end of last year.

Access to vaccine

Whenever the COVID-19 vaccine is brought up among people at social gatherings I attend, I hear people say that: “I’d rather not be among the first to take it.” Granted, these are people that are not in risk groups and that hence tend to not fear the virus for themselves. In Australia we are partially sheltered from the devastating harms and deaths caused by the virus, as one of few countries that have managed to keep the virus at bay. People are therefore more concerned with the rush under which the virus has been developed and potential consequences of the vaccine, rather than the virus itself.

Due to the low levels of Corona cases in Australia, we are in a quite unique position to hold off on vaccines, to see how the vaccines fairs in other countries. This is a luxurious position to be in, while other nations are scrambling to use the vaccines to help curtail the rapid spread of the virus.

Meanwhile, many poorer countries are at risk of delayed access to vaccine. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, Director-General of the World Health Organisation (WHO) cautions that the unequal distribution of the vaccine to poorer countries is leading to a ‘catastrophic moral failure’. Richer countries are buying up available vaccines, leaving the poorer in danger of missing out. This, Tedros says, will extend the life of the pandemic.

Extended inequalities

The inequalities between countries have never been more apparent than during this global pandemic. Yet, the pandemic is far from over, and the aftermaths are yet to be fully appreciated. Apart from the previously named inequalities and manners in which the pandemic has extended these, delaying the distribution of vaccine to poorer countries, will continue to magnify socioeconomic and health inequalities between rich and poor.

The WHO is calling for wealthier countries to support Covax, a vaccine-distribution scheme aimed at providing equitable access to vaccine for all countries. For Covax to be successful, wealthier nations need to stop making separate bilateral deals which put them ahead of vulnerable populations in poorer countries. More than that, these rising inequalities require further commitments on part of wealthier nations to support other countries to deal with the pandemic and its aftermaths, to minimise poverty, suffering and harm.

What if you woke up to find that you are not allowed to move beyond 5 kilometres of your home? Oh wait, we already did.

What if you woke up one day to find that you are not allowed to move beyond 5 kilometres of your home? Actually, that already happened. Two months ago, people in Melbourne were told that, from that night forward, we were no longer allowed to go beyond 5 kilometres of our homes (unless for essential work or health related reasons). The Prime Minister of Victoria (the state Melbourne is located in) announced that: ‘Where you slept last night is where you’ll need to stay for the next six weeks’. If the police find you outside of that distance, without a valid reason, you risk incurring a fine of up to $1652 AUD. These are extreme, punitively enforced measure meant to limit the spread of coronavirus by restricting our movements.

Since the lockdown, I try to get out of my house for a daily walk. I walk in circles around my home. Trying and often failing to find new, interesting alternatives to my standard route. I live close to a major road called Ballarat Road. On one side of it, there is an industrial area. However, if I move beyond the anonymous industrial buildings, I reach the river with a trail running along it. Unfortunately, it lacks lighting, and, on weekdays, I usually do not get out before dark. So, I stay on the other side of Ballarat Road, around the residential area. The smaller the roads, the more I prefer to walk there. In the two and a half months I have lived here I have really gotten to know my neighbourhood in ways I usually would not.

What do you have within 5 kilometres of your home? If you are not in Melbourne, imagine if all you could access for the next two months was what is within 5 kilometres of your home. Neighbourhood characteristics, amenities and services are important component of urban equality. Well planned, liveable and healthy neighbourhoods and cities should provide everything you need within a walkable distance.

Similar to the ways COVID-19 is exacerbating issues of mental health, the struggles of doing a PhD, a healthy lifestyle and so on, COVID is also exacerbating social and economic inequalities. I have preciously talked about the significance of a house or apartment and the size of one’s property as we spend more time at home. However, add to this the inequalities associated with location. There is a huge disparity between living within five kilometres of a beach, a green area or in a satellite suburb (suburbs on the outskirts of major cities) far from amenities. Is your neighbourhood walkable? Do you have access to green open spaces? These inequalities remain after the 5 km rule is lifted and when shops, cafes, restaurants and bars reopen once again. What amenities are within five kilometres of your home? The cinema? A swimming pool? A gym? How many choices of restaurants and cafes?

These ideas are articulated in ‘20-minute neighbourhoods’, an approach to city planning proposing that everyone should be able to access a variety of services within a twenty-minute walkable round trip of their homes (about 800 meters one-way). This includes education, shopping, recreational and sporting facilities, business services and some job opportunities. Also, 20-minute neighbourhoods are walkable and provide high-quality open spaces. The establishment of a 20-minute city is an important component in the state government’s plans for Melbourne in the coming decades. However, we are still far from meeting that goal.

The 20-minute test is more stringent than the 5 kilometre one. Nonetheless the 5-kilometre restrictions, expected to last for at least another two weeks in Melbourne, underscore the injustices that are woven into the urban landscape.  Whether you currently spend your life within five kilometres of your home or are allowed to move around freely, we should stop to consider the equality of our cities and what minimal standards of accessibility we required in our neighbourhoods.

Atmospheres of change

It is the changing winds, smells and tastes on Earth. It is about the liquid, the solid, the gaseous, the living, the dying and the in-between. It is about the human, the more-than-human and the relationship between the two. There are atmospheres of change, both in the physical and metaphorical sense. I love joining words together in such sequences, more of which will follow in this semi-academic blog.